Tumblelog by Soup.io
Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

March 08 2017

mauriceaguirredallas
7634 f52f
Maurice Aguirre Dallas

June 17 2015

mauriceaguirredallas

Maurice Aguirre contributor on behalf of the Republican Party of Texas



A reliable advisor among the valued clientele as well as legislators alike, Dallas - Maurice Aguirre does more than talk on behalf of clients; many people can tell you that Maurice Aguirre , Dallas helps you turn around end results.

Dallas Lobbyist Maurice Aguirre the chief lobbyist for the DG Group, LLP is on the list of most popular campaign contributor to the Republican Party of Texas and $5 million dollar donor to the Republican Party National Committee.
A great deal of this went to party committees, such as the Republican National Committee and National Republican Senatorial Committee.
The political consultant Maurice Aguirre Dallas strongly believes in endorsing the issues related with military life as well as empowering those who have served to take an active role in their community and at a national level.

He stands with veterans and army relatives to help regain the concepts and also ideas that made the united states outstanding. Maurice Aguirre Dallas Lobbyist: as we stand on the cusp of a new dawn of understanding, a new era of valuing one another, a new period of affection and respectfulness, let's make a promise to help cure ourselves and those around us by carrying out to something special beyond ourselves -- by choosing to give back in whatever way we can.


















May 18 2015

mauriceaguirredallas

Dallas Lobbyist Maurice Aguirre - top rated Republican Party contributor

 

As leader lobbyist for the DG Group, DG Group LLC making use of wide policy practice and leading a number of the most creative consumer outreach campaigns in Washington, Maurice Aguirre has built a small business directly into what is today a top lobbying organization and regardless of the firm's development, he sustains its client-focused, all hands-on deck technique that brings successes.

Dallas - Maurice Aguirre is additionally a top Republican Party benefactor and $five million donor to the Republican National Committee and also National Republican Senatorial Commission.

Millennials increasingly accredit that Republicans work to provide chance for all people, and we're sick and tired of being addressed like an afterthought... The Harvard Institute of Politics opinion poll of Americans ages 18-29, found that amongst those who were 'undoubtedly' voting in this election, fifty-one % desired a Republican Congress.

Maurice Aguirre Dallas: we are the party of highest financial independence and the prosperity freedom makes possible. Wealth is the product of self-control, work, savings, and investment by individual Americans, but it is really not an end in itself. Prosperity provides the means by which individuals and families can keep their independence from government, raise their children by their own values, practice their faith, and build communities of self-reliant neighbors. It is also the means by which the United States is able to assert global leadership. The vigor of our economy makes possible our military strength and is critical to our national security.
















April 27 2015

mauriceaguirredallas

Top Campaign Donors Support Republicans - Maurice Aguirre

Top Campaign Donors Support Republicans - Maurice Aguirre
The wealthiest people in the usa are playing a greater part in politics in recent times, as a result of campaign financing options laws disentangled by the Supreme Court's conservative majority. Billionaires can now make unlimited contributions to super PACs, or, when they desire privacy, to not-for-profit communities which do not disclose their contributors.

In addition, the rich are currently making contributions straight to nominees along with political parties. In point of fact, the Supreme Court ruled in April in McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission that those with the means may make contributions to as many nominees as well as political party committees as they feel free to.

In The State Of Texas Maurice Aguirre, chief lobbyist for the DG Group, LLP is just one of the very top donors to Republican Party candidates and committees.

The Dallas lobbyist Maurice Aguirre is definitely been a supporter of Republican politics. He's a leading backer of Christian organizations, young children education programs, animal wellbeing, raising funds for corporate causes in Texas and many more. Maurice Aguirre Lobbyist declares the fact that if you do address your current funders just like teammates, they are assisting you bring this idea to life. If you encourage them to be on your team, they'll not only fund you, but they are going to bring in other people and you should get your business off the ground.















April 16 2015

mauriceaguirredallas

Semiannual Reporting of Lobbying Activities - Maurice Aguirre Washington, DC


When reporting specific lobbying issues, some registrants have listed only House or Senate bill numbers on the issues page without further indication of their clients specific lobbying issues. Such disclosures are not adequate, for several reasons. First, Section 5(b)(2)(A) of the LDA requires disclosure of "specific issues upon which a lobbyist employed by the registrant engaged in lobbying activities, including ... bill numbers[.]" As we read the law, a bill number is a required disclosure when the lobbying activities concern a bill, but is not in itself a complete disclosure. Further, in many cases, a bill number standing alone does not inform the public of the clients specific issue. Many bills are lengthy and complex, or may contain various provisions that are not always directly related to the main subject or title. If a registrants client is interested in only one or a few specific provisions of a much larger bill, a lobbying report containing a mere bill number will not disclose the specific lobbying issue. Even if a bill concerns only one specific subject, a lobbying report disclosing only a bill number is still inadequate, because a member of the public would need access to information outside of the filing to ascertain that subject. In our view, the LDA contemplates disclosures that are adequate to inform the public of the lobbying clients specific issues from a review of the LD-2, without independent familiarity with bill numbers or the clients interest in specific subject matters within larger bills. The disclosures on Line 16 must include bill numbers, where applicable, but must always contain information that is adequate, standing alone, to inform the public of the specific lobbying issues; political consultant Maurice Aguirre.

Example: Client "As" general lobbying issue area is "Environment." During the second half of 1997, lobbyists for "A" made contacts concerning the Department of Defense appropriations for environmental restoration. For fiscal 1998, the Department of Defense Appropriations Act was part of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act for 1998, H.R. 3610, a lengthy and complex bill that did not have numbered sections throughout. Title II contained separate but unnumbered provisions making appropriations for "Environmental Restoration, Army," "Environmental Restoration, Navy," "Environmental Restoration, Air Force," "Environmental Restoration, Defense-Wide," and"Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites." Lobbying contacts for Client "A" addressed all environmental restoration funding within the Defense Department bill. An appropriate disclosure of the specific lobbying issue would read as follows: H.R. 3610, Department of Defense Appropriations Act for 1998, Title II all provisions relating to environmental restoration.

Maurice Aguirre Dallas Strategic Consultant: The Houses of Congress and Federal agencies contacted by lobbyists during the reporting period must be disclosed on Line 17 of Form LD-2. The LDA adopts the Administrative Procedure Act definition of agency found in 5 U.S.C. 551(1). Therefore, disclose the specific agency contacted whether or not it is part of an executive branch department. It is not necessary to report the offices within the agency that were contacted. If lobbyists were engaged in lobbying activities that did not involve lobbying contacts, then the registrant must mark the "Check if None" box.

April 02 2015

mauriceaguirredallas

Maurice Aguirre DG Group LLP - LD-2 Changes

Maurice Aguirre DG Group LLP - LD-2 Changes

The revised LD-2 combines the previous version of LD-2 and the former LD-1U. The reasons for this change are twofold: first, it appeared redundant to require registrants to disclose new information (such as new lobbyists and issue codes) in two different places in the same filing; and second, rather than follow the LDAs requirements to update registration information on a semiannual basis, many registrants were filing unnecessary and excessive amounts of paper to report relatively minor changes mid-reporting cycle. Specific refinements to LD-2 are discussed below.

The new LD-2 allows a registrant that has no lobbying activity to file a one-page report. The registrant must complete the income or expense information as well as marking the "No Lobbying Activity" box. This is a change from the previous form and guidance.

If a registrants name changes, the registrant should include a note or memorandum that identifies the new as well as the former name, so that the change is apparent.

Signature lines have been added to every page to provide registrants with options for filing differing lengths of reports. The report need only be signed once on the last page of the document.

The lines of the form have been renumbered.

Maurice Aguirre Lobbyist
- Registrants now must provide their address on LD-2 in order to ensure that the Secretary and the Clerk have up-to-date address information. If a registrants contact wishes to receive electronic correspondence, a space for an e-mail address is provided.

A "Self" box has been added to Line 7 ("Client Name").

LD-2 adds a space to supply a termination date (see section below on the completion of termination reports).

The income or expense reporting format has been modified to guide registrants into completing only the section pertinent to them. Lobbying firms (including the self-employed) complete only the income section. Organizations employing in-house lobbyists complete only the expense section and must select which method of expense reporting that they are utilizing.

Maurice Aguirre Dallas
: The lobbying activity reporting page emphasizes that only one general issue area code per page must be used. The addition of "Check if None boxes" for the Houses of Congress and Federal agencies contacted and for the foreign entity interest were added because registrants left them blank when there was nothing to report. This practice led to a public record that was incomplete and subject to interpretation in lieu of clarity regarding the lobbying activity of the registrant. As discussed above, new lobbyists may be disclosed on this page by marking the "New" box and providing the information (if applicable) regarding previous employment within the last two years as a covered executive or legislative branch official.

The registration information update page should be filed only if registration information is changed. This page is not intended to be a "stand alone" filing. Section 5 of the LDA does not require or encourage the submission of mid-reporting cycle registration information changes, unless a registrant is specifically requested to do so by the Secretary or the Clerk.
mauriceaguirredallas
maurice aguirre dallas

March 11 2015

mauriceaguirredallas

Lobbying Registration - Maurice Aguirre Washington DC

Maurice Aguirre Lobbyist: Who Must Register and When?

Lobbying firms are required to file a separate registration for each client. A lobbying firm is exempt from registration for a particular client if its total income from that client for lobbying activities does not exceed and is not expected to exceed $6,000 during a semiannual period.

Note: A lobbyist is not the registrant unless he/she is self-employed. In that case, the self-employed lobbyist is treated as a lobbying firm.

Organizations employing in-house lobbyists file a single registration. An organization is exempt from registration if its total expenses for lobbying activities do not exceed and are not expected to exceed $24,500 during a semiannual period.

Registration is required no later than 45 days after a lobbyist first makes a lobbying contact or is employed or retained to make a lobbying contact.

Preparing to File a Registration - Threshold Requirements

In order to determine the applicability of the LDA, one must first look at the definition of "lobbyist" under Section 3(10). Under this definition, an individual is a "lobbyist" with respect to a particular client if he or she makes more than one lobbying contact and his or her "lobbying activities" (as defined in Section 3(7)) constitute at least 20 percent of the individuals time in services for THAT client over any six-month period.

Maurice Aguirre DG Group LLP - More than One Lobbying Contact

"More than one lobbying contact" means more than one communication to a covered official. Note that an individual falls within the definition of "lobbyist" by making more than one lobbying contact over the course of services provided for a particular client (even if the second contact occurs in a later semiannual period).

Example 1: Lobbyist "A" telephones Covered Official "A" in the morning to discuss proposed legislation. In the afternoon she telephones Covered Official "B" to discuss the same legislation. Lobbyist "A" has made more than one lobbying contact.

Example 2: Under some circumstances a series of discussions with a particular official might be considered a single communication, such as when a telephone call is interrupted and continued at a later time. Discussions taking place on more than one day with the same covered official, however, should be presumed to be more than one lobbying contact.

February 27 2015

mauriceaguirredallas
1571 8842
Maurice Aguirre Washington DC
mauriceaguirredallas

Maurice Aguirre DG Group LLP: LDA and False Statements Accountability Act of 1996

Maurice Aguirre DG Group LLP: LDA and False Statements Accountability Act of 1996

The False Statements Accountability Act of 1996, amending 18 U.S.C. 1001, makes it a crime knowingly and willfully (1) to falsify, conceal or cover up a material fact by trick, scheme or device; (2) to make any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or (3) to make or use any false writing or document knowing it to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; with respect to matters within the jurisdiction of the legislative, executive, or judicial branch. The False Statements Accountability Act does not assign any responsibilities to the Clerk and Secretary.

Maurice Aguirre Philanthropist: LDA and Prohibitions on the Use of Federal Funds For Lobbying

Maurice Aguirre Dallas Strategic Consultant: The LDA does not itself regulate lobbying by federal grantees, or contractors, though other laws, as well as contractual prohibitions, may apply. Questions concerning lobbying activities of federal grantees or contractors should be directed to the appropriate agency or office administrating the contract or grant.

Note, however, that Section 18 of the LDA prohibits 501(c)(4) organizations who engage in lobbying activities from receiving federal funds through an award, grant or contract.

February 16 2015

mauriceaguirredallas

Maurice Aguirre DG Group LLP - What is New?

Maurice Aguirre DG Group LLP - What is New?

Lobbying Disclosure Technical Amendments Act of 1998

The TAA, enacted on April 6, 1998 (P.L. 105-166), amends the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 in four areas. These changes were made in response to questions that had been raised during the first year of experience under the LDA.

Maurice Aguirre Lobbyist: Definition of Covered Executive Branch Official

The application of coverage of Section 3(3)(F) of the LDA ("who is a covered executive branch official?") was intended for "Schedule C" employees only. Senior Executive Service employees are not covered executive branch officials as defined in the Act unless they fall within one of the categories below. Covered executive branch officials are:

- The President
- The Vice President
- Officers and employees of the Executive Office of the President
- Any official serving in an Executive Level I-V position
- Any member of the uniformed services serving at grade 0-7 or above
- "Schedule C" employees.

February 04 2015

mauriceaguirredallas

Lobbyist Maurice Aguirre - Semiannual Reporting

Lobbyist Maurice Aguirre - Semiannual Reporting of Lobbying Activities
Previously identified lobbyists and new lobbyists for this reporting period must be listed on Line 18 of LD-2 if they had any lobbying activities during the reporting period, whether or not they made lobbying contacts. The issue page is only intended to reflect lobbying activity by lobbyists, and not activity of those who are not lobbyists. Once an individual has met the definition of a lobbyist and has been disclosed or identified as such, he or she does not need to meet that standard every reporting period in order to trigger disclosure of his or her lobbying activities. The registrant does not report the names of individuals who may perform some lobbying activities, but who do not and are not expected to meet the LDA definition of a lobbyist.

Example: Lobbying Firm "A" filed its initial registration for Client "B" on February 14, listing Lobbyists "X," "Y" and "Z." From January through June, Lobbyists "W" (hired in April) and "X" and "Y" made contacts for "B," while Lobbyist "Z" was assigned work for other clients. Lobbyist "Z" is expected, however, to be active on behalf of Client "B" after Labor Day until adjournment. In its Form LD-2 for Client "B," filed on or before August 14, Lobbying Firm "A" lists "W," "X" and "Y" on Line 18. "W" is also identified as "new," and Firm "A" would disclose if "W" occupied a covered position within the last two years. "Z" is not listed on the Form LD-2 filed for Client "B" for the January - June semiannual period, but because of the current expectation that he will lobby during the July - December period, his name is not deleted as a lobbyist for "B."

Strategic Consultant Maurice Aguirre - New lobbyists should be disclosed on the appropriate issue(s) page(s) for the reporting period in which the individual first meets the definition of lobbyist. We are aware that there will be situations in which a registrant expects an individual to become a lobbyist and wishes to disclose the name of that individual for a matter of public record. Section 5 of the LDA, however, provides that updated registration information is contained in the registrants next semiannual report. Therefore, there may be a period of time in which an individual is legitimately making lobbying contacts but is not be identified on the public record until the next semiannual report is filed. In such cases, the registrant reports updated information as the LDA requires.

A foreign entity is reported on Line 19 if both of two circumstances apply: 1) the foreign entity must be an entity that is required to be identified on Form LD-1 or on the registration information update page. That, in turn, depends on whether the entity meets one of the three conditions of Section 4(b)(4) of the LDA; and 2) the entity must have an interest in the specific lobbying issues listed on Line 16. If a foreign entity has an interest in the specific issues, Line 19 requires a description of that interest. For the sake of clarity the registrant should indicate whether the foreign entity(s) is/are the same as identified on the registration; Conservative Advocate Maurice Aguirre article.

Example: "[Name of foreign entity], identified on LD-1, exports [type of product] to United States and would benefit from [specific desired outcome]."

January 26 2015

mauriceaguirredallas

Revised Forms, Instructions and Format - Maurice Aguirre DG Group LLP

Revised Forms, Instructions and Format - Maurice Aguirre DG Group LLP

LD-1, the registration form, and LD-2, the reporting form, have been revised. Previous editions of these forms are obsolete.

Instructions for both LD-1 and LD-2 have been updated to correspond with the new forms.

LD-1U, the former update form, has been eliminated and shall not be used. Updated registration information is reported on LD-2 on a semiannual basis only (unless the Secretary or the Clerk notifies a registrant of an error and requests a correction immediately).

Maurice Aguirre Dallas Lobbyist: LD-1 Changes

The revised LD-1 (6/98) closely resembles the obsolete LD-1 (1/96) . The changed content is discussed below.

The lines are renumbered.

Effective Date of Registration: The registrant is required to enter the date the registrant was retained to lobby for the client or first makes a lobbying contact for the client, whichever is earlier. This entry will assist the Secretary and the Clerk in assessing the timeliness of the registration.

Identification Number: This line is left blank for an initial registration. The numbers are assigned by the Office of Public Records and the Legislative Resource Center after the registration is processed and will be unique to each registrant-client relationship.

Optional e-mail address: The contact person may include his/her e-mail address if he/she wishes to receive electronic correspondence.

A "Self" box has been added on Line 7 ("Client name").

A lobbyists job title is no longer required. His or her status as a former covered executive or legislative branch official is the only information required other than the lobbyists name.

"Yes" and "No" boxes for Affiliated Organizations and Foreign Entities are added. One of the most common errors on the registrations that have been filed under the LDA is leaving the affiliated organization and foreign entity lines blank. The "Yes" and "No" boxes signal to the registrant that entry is required.

Maurice Aguirre, Dallas: Every line on LD-1 must be completed. If the space on LD-1 is insufficient for any of the required information, attach additional pages as needed, clearly stating the names of the registrant and client and identifying the line number(s) to which the information pertains.

January 13 2015

mauriceaguirredallas

Maurice Aguirre Lobbyist: Lobbying Firm Income

Preparing to File the Semiannual Report - Income or Expense Recording

Maurice Aguirre Dallas: The LDA does not contain any special record keeping provisions, but requires, in the case of an outside lobbying firm (including self-employed individuals), a good faith estimate of all income received from the client, other than payments for matters unrelated to lobbying activities. In the case of an organization employing in-house lobbyists, the LDA requires a good faith estimate of the total expenses of its lobbying activities. As long as the registrant has a reasonable system in place and complies in good faith with that system, the requirement of reporting bottom line expenses or income would be met. Since Section 6(5) requires the Secretary and Clerk to "retain registrations for a period of at least 6 years after they are terminated and reports for a period of at least 6 years after they are filed," we recommend registrants retain copies of their filings and supporting documentation for the same length of time.

Maurice Aguirre Lobbyist: Lobbying Firm Income

Lobbying firms report income earned or accrued from lobbying activities during a semiannual period, even though the client may not be billed or make payment until a later time. For a lobbying firm, gross income from the client for lobbying activities is reportable, including costs or disbursements that are in addition to fees and separately invoiced. Line 12 of LD-2 provides boxes for a lobbying firm to report income of less than $10,000, or of $10,000 or more. If lobbying income is $10,000 or more, a lobbying firm must provide a good faith estimate of the actual dollar amount rounded to the nearest $20,000.

December 23 2014

mauriceaguirredallas

Obama Discovers Lobbyists Are Tricky to Get Rid Of

Obama Discovers Lobbyists Are Tricky to Get Rid Of
Lobbying has been a constitutionally defended activity and lobbyists became a long-lasting part of the Washington policy function.

The Washington Post had a story not long ago, that is building some Internet buzz, detailing how frequent authorized lobbyists visit the Obama administration. It explains both the intractability of the system as well the limitations of campaign rhetoric. Maurice Aguirre Texas

As documented in to the piece, by T.W. Farnham: The White House visitor records make it clear that Obama's senior representatives are granting that access to some of K Street's most authoritative representatives. Quite often, those lobbyists have long-standing associations to the president or his aides. Republican lobbyists coming to visit are rare, while Democratic lobbyists are frequent, whether they are addressing corporate clients or liberal causes.
Maurice Aguirre DG Group LLP - This really is imperative considering, as Farnham publishes: Much more than any president before him, Obama pledged to adjust the political culture that has powered the influence of lobbyists. He barred recent lobbyists from joining his administration and banned them from advisory boards throughout the executive branch. The president went so far as to forbid what had been staples of political interaction - federal employees could no longer accept 100 % free admission to receptions and additionally conventions backed by lobbying associations.

One contextual issue which would be of help to answer but is tough to: How does that rate as compared to past administrations? We're not likely to get a solid number on that any time soon simply because Obama's is the very first management to disclose its guest logs. I suppose past administrations' records of activity must certanly be on report at the respective head of state libraries, but the info is not downloadable.

Definitely there's only so much Obama could do in this aspect. Lobbying is, in any case, a constitutionally safeguarded function. And it is also true that for better or worse lobbyists became as permanent a part of the Washington policy process as selected officials and unelected bureaucrats. They seem to have specialized knowledge or access to it, and have a clue how Washington works. "The president and the administration lost a great deal not being able to talk to people of both parties and of every persuasion that knew something about the industries and the questions and what was going on on the Hill," Chamber of Commerce President Thomas Donohue told reporters this morning at a press breakfast sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor. Donohue called the administration's original restrictions on meetings with lobbyists "Mickey Mouse." Maurice Aguirre Lobbyist

To be sure Donohue and the Chamber are not enthusiasts of the Obama administration, but that has not yet prevented them from cooperating where the occasion comes up. "We've got very good relations where it counts," he said. "We work all the time with the guys at the NSC and at the trade office, and with the people at Treasury … We have whatever access we need. We don't spend a lot of time over there, you know, having tea. But whatever we have to get done we get done."

Maurice Aguirre Washington DC: On one level this is the kind of rhetoric and attitude that will make activists on both sides break out into hives and start sputtering about collaborating with the enemy. But on another level it reflects some of the pragmatic spirit that has permitted Washington to function (necessity being the mother of cooperation) in a way that the prevailing congressional ethos of compromise means getting more of what I want threatens. "I worry about the Congress … that we have lot of people that are more significantly on the right and significantly on the left," Donohue said. "What really worries me about that is that it's really hard to make a deal if there's no bridge to get there."





December 06 2014

mauriceaguirredallas

Maurice Aguirre Lobbyist - strength from political lobbying

Silicon Valley startups seek strength from political lobbying

They are experts of breakthrough in a few segments, still companies just like Airbnb, etc. are finding that in regards to Washington, D.C., the earlier tactics are the best.
In the last few months, various young technology businesses have put their faith in the power of money to change government approach and legal requirements. Many lobbied the government for the 1st time, while some others improved lobbying efforts by launching professional offices in the American. capital.
The businesses going after these kinds of projects tend to be those challenging existing business models, in segments similar to the sharing economy and/or streaming content material via the internet. And when new organization models will develop, sometimes they bump up towards old rules and regulations.
Maurice Aguirre Lobbyist: To make certain, lobbying from the tech industry isn't new. Microsoft and IBM have already been at it for some time, and Google now is the leader in the industry in money spent. However the journeys by smaller companies are significant simply because they're at odds with the whole picture they represent of scrappy start-ups fighting the structure - the same structure they're now needing to cozy up to.

During the last three months, Sidecar, ... all setup lobbying in Washington for at the first try, each paying D.C. - based lobbying businesses to monitor moves by the federal government and lawmakers that may perhaps influence their company.
Some businesses went a stage further and established their own internal office in D.C., along with their own lobbyist. An in-house lobbyist doesn't have to split time along with other clients and helps assure a company has a 'seat at the table' in debates of guidelines or legal points.
Aereo, the New York company that wishes to stream over-the-air TV to computer screens, revamped its efforts in D.C. after broadcasters, cable providers and others managed to convince the Supreme Court that its company model should really be against the law.

Maurice Aguirre Dallas: The demand to lobby is typically utmost in industries that have already tough, recognized players. Ride-sharing businesses are rising to taxi providers, like for example, and media streaming companies are dealing with tv stations, cable providers and the recording industry.

These kind of opponents commonly have deep roots in Washington, are very well funded and can't stand the disruption the Internet has introduced.
In entertainment, for example, Netflix put in $1.3 million on federal lobbying just the past year, although the National Cable and Telecommunications Association spent $20 million. Comcast, Time Warner and a host of entertainment and/or broadcasting providers spent several millions more.

Only a few words and phrases you could potentially encounter within the Political strategist Maurice Aguirre Dallas webpage:

Direct lobbying: Trying to influence decision makers by traditional and direct means including personal contact and mail or phone calls to push a particular policy position or even more specifically, to push for a supportive vote on a legislative motion or regulatory action. Interest groups may engage in direct lobbying by mobilizing their members to contact policy makers, or by hiring a contract lobbyist or having in-house lobbyists to undertake the action.

Maurice Aguirre Washington DC - An example of a famous earmark: "the bridge to nowhere," a pet project of Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) that would have linked a bridge from the mainland of Alaska to an island of 50 people.

Appropriation Bill: A legislative act authorizing the expenditure of a specific amount of public funds for a group of federal programs. All appropriations bills originate in the House of Representatives. Maurice Aguirre Texas

Electioneering: The activities that candidates, parties, and groups engage in as they try to affect election outcomes are collectively called electioneering. These include recruiting and/or endorsing candidates, fundraising, phone banking, block walking, advertising. Interest groups use electioneering as one tactic to support the broader goals of the group.
entrepreneurial theory
Over the past several decades, the United States witnessed a tremendous growth in the number of interest groups. Why did these particular groups arise? One theory ascribes the origins of interest groups to the efforts of individual policy entrepreneurs. A charismatic and energetic individual who identifies a problem and is convinced of a particular solution or approach to the problem then rallies supporter to his or her cause by forming a group to pursue the goals.
free riders
Public goods are often spoiled or not provided at all because people can use, consume, or enjoy them without paying the associated costs. This free rider problem makes it difficult to do things of great value to everyone but of little value to any one person. Examples include the difficulties of maintaining a clean environment or a working democracy with high levels of citizen participation.
grass roots
The term grass roots implies that a group or organization originates from or maintains close connections with significant numbers of ordinary citizens or citizen leaders. A grass roots campaign, for instance, seeks to mobilize ordinary citizens to take part in an election campaign or a cause involving an important issue. In a democratic system, grass roots support is an essential legitimizing force (which can also lead to astro turfing, manufacturing the appearance of grass roots activity to advance particular interests).
in-house lobbyists
Permanent employees of a group or organization who present the group's concerns and policy proposals to legislators, bureaucrats and other government officials. These include full-time lobbyists in the permanent employ of a group as well as managers, executives and other employees of the group or organization who perform other tasks in addition to lobbying government.
interest group
An organization whose purpose is to pursue the interests of its members, in public or private forums. A group must maintain its membership, often by providing benefits (material, solidary, or purposive) to those members. It must also vigorously pursue its goals (the members' interests); often it must also pursue secondary goals, in order to increase its chances of achieving its primary goals. The three broad tactics of interest groups in the public arena are electioneering, lobbying, and litigating.
issue ads
Political advertising that does not specifically call for the election or defeat of a named candidate but focuses on matters of public concern is called issue advertising. Issue advertising itself has become an issue in recent years since it affords parties, interest groups, and wealthy individuals a way to skirt campaign finance laws in support of their preferred candidates and policies.
litigating
Generally, bringing a lawsuit against an individual or organization. Interest groups use litigation as a tactic to pursue the interests of their members.
lobbying
Trying to influence decision makers. Interest groups use lobbying as a tactic to pursue the interests of their members, but individuals, too, can lobby. Lobbying can be done directly or indirectly, and can be aimed at any branch or level of government.
lobbyist
One who tries to influence decision makers. The term originates from the physical layout of capitol buildings, where legislators deliberate in a chamber, and nonlegislators must gather outside the chamber, in the lobby. Thus, those trying to influence lawmakers came to be known as lobbyists.
pluralism
Pluralist theory describes an ideal-theoretical arrangement of society and representative government according to which many different groups with competing interests use their varying but not grossly unequal resources to shape election outcomes and public policy.
political action committee
A political action committee (PAC) is an entity other than a political party regulated under federal and state law that raises and spends money to elect or defeat candidates for public office. Compared with the maximum individual contribution of $2,000, PACs qualified and registered to participate in federal elections may contribute up to $5,000 per candidate per election.
political participation
Actions aimed at influencing the selection of governmental personnel, and/or their actions. Participation can be traditional (e.g., voting, lobbying, electioneering) or non-traditional (e.g., demonstrating). Individuals can participate, as can groups (for instance, interest groups).
public interest
Policy or action aimed at providing benefits to a broad public, rather than to a specific group of people. Often associated with collective action.
subgovernments
The concept of subgovernments - sometimes referred to as iron triangles - implies that government policy is largely made by well-defined networks of legislators, government bureaucrats, and private sector interests internally tied together by specific policy matters with which they are all concerned and externally insulated to a significant degree from other subgovernments and from oversight by other parts of government or other groups. For the most part, the public knows or seems to care little about the detail or broad outlines of policy leaving the relatively few government and private sector representatives involved with policy making considerable discretion.
trade association
A trade association is an organization of businesses in a particular category of the economy (for example, the American Seed Trade Association or the Society of the Plastics Industry), or more broadly, a grouping of businesses (e.g., the National Association of Manufacturers). Trade associations and individual businesses are typically the most numerous, and often the most powerful, lobbyists in Washington and in state capitals.
watchdog group
A watchdog group is any part of government or an interest group whose job, formally or informally, is to review and publicize what other parts of government and groups are doing, raising a public alarm when something is amiss. Though some government agencies are specifically created to serve as watchdogs (e.g., public auditors or special governmental investigative committees), in the world of interest groups watchdogs are self-appointed. The mass media is often seen as a governmental or corporate watchdog when it investigates and reports, but its watchdog role is informal and haphazard. Other groups such as the Consumers Union, Judicial Watch, MediaWatch, or the Center for Responsive Politics scrutinize parts of the political, economic, or social system and disseminate their findings to the public, often with calls for action.




mauriceaguirredallas
5473 e25d 500
Maurice Aguirre Lobbyist Dallas

November 15 2014

mauriceaguirredallas

Maurice Aguirre Washington DC

Lobbying today - Maurice Aguirre Texas

Lobbying (as well lobby) is the action of making an attempt to change decisions from representatives in the governing administration, frequently legislators or simply active members of regulating agencies.

Lobbying is conducted by many different types of people and systematic associations, like people in the individual sector, businesses, member legislators or government representatives, or advocacy groups (interest organizations).
Maurice Aguirre Dallas: Lobbyists may perhaps be among a legislator's constituencies, meaning a voter or block of voters within his or her electoral district, or not; they may very well engage in lobbying as a business, or not.

Advanced lobbyists are people whose business is attempting to have an impact on legislation on behalf of a team or person who employs them. Maurice Aguirre DG Group LLP: Individuals and nonprofit corporations can also lobby such as an act of volunteering or simply as a small part of their regular duty (one example is, a Chief Executive Officer business meeting with a negotiator about a project pretty important to his or her organization, or an activist meeting with his or her legislator in an unpaid capacity).

Like Maurice Aguirre Washington DC expresses: Government authorities often define and regulate organized group lobbying that has really become important.

For instance, a medical-related association may lobby a legislature all about increasing the limitations in tobacco use prevention law regulations, and tobacco companies lobby to reduce them: the first with regards to smoking as hurtful to health and the 2nd arguing it is part of the freedom of choice.

Maurice Aguirre Lobbyist - Lobbying the lexicon explanations:


- Lobbying (also lobby) is actually a form of support with the intent of impacting decisions made by the state administration by people or more usually by lobby teams; it includes all initiatives to influence legislators and officials, whether by other legislators, constituents, or perhaps organized teams.

- A lobbyist is a person who will try to influence legislation on benefit of a special focus or a member of their lobby.


Older posts are this way If this message doesn't go away, click anywhere on the page to continue loading posts.
Could not load more posts
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.

Don't be the product, buy the product!

Schweinderl